Skip to content

chore: upgrade htmljs-parser to ^5.12.1 - #547

Merged
DylanPiercey merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/language-server-script-output-1i703y
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

chore: upgrade htmljs-parser to ^5.12.1#547
DylanPiercey merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/language-server-script-output-1i703y

Conversation

@DylanPiercey

@DylanPiercey DylanPiercey commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrades htmljs-parser to ^5.12.1 (from ^5.11.0) in @marko/language-tools and @marko/language-server.

This picks up the v5.12.0 fix (htmljs-parser#215) where a { following a completed return type now ends the type annotation, so a </> comparison in the body of a static/server/client function is no longer parsed as a closing generic bracket. Previously such a function swallowed the rest of the template, breaking script extraction (e.g. "Show Extracted Script Output").

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4fcc637

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 5 packages
Name Type
@marko/language-server Patch
@marko/language-tools Patch
@marko/ts-plugin Patch
@marko/type-check Patch
marko-vscode Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 9 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: e9a55db8-36bb-482e-9768-d6137381342a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8932b38 and 4fcc637.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json and included by **
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .changeset/upgrade-htmljs-parser.md
  • packages/language-server/package.json
  • packages/language-tools/package.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch claude/language-server-script-output-1i703y

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@DylanPiercey
DylanPiercey merged commit 58e58ef into main Jul 3, 2026
5 checks passed
@DylanPiercey
DylanPiercey deleted the claude/language-server-script-output-1i703y branch July 3, 2026 20:32
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2026
@DylanPiercey DylanPiercey moved this to Done in Roadmap Jul 31, 2026
@DylanPiercey DylanPiercey self-assigned this Jul 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant